Union Calendar No. 248
118th CONGRESS 1st Session |
[Report No. 118–307, Part I]
To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to reform certain authorities and to provide greater transparency and oversight.
December 4, 2023
Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Jordan, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Davidson, Ms. Jacobs, and Mr. Fry) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
December 11, 2023
Additional sponsors: Mr. Lieu, Mr. Crane, Ms. Norton, Ms. Hoyle of Oregon, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Tiffany, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Roy, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Collins, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Mace, Mr. Casar, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Weber of Texas, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Mooney, Ms. Chu, and Ms. Porter
December 11, 2023
Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary with an amendment
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
December 11, 2023
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on December 4, 2023]
To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to reform certain authorities and to provide greater transparency and oversight.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
This Act may be cited as the “Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act of 2023”.
SEC. 2. Query procedure reform.
(a) Limitation on eligibility to conduct queries.—Section 702(f)(1) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881a(f)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(D) LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY OF FBI PERSONNEL TO CONDUCT UNITED STATES PERSON QUERIES.—The Attorney General shall ensure that the procedures adopted under subparagraph (A) limit the authority to conduct queries such that—
“(i) for each field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the most senior official whose primary duty station is that field office is authorized to designate not more than five individuals whose primary duty station is that field office who are eligible to conduct a query using a United States person query term; and
“(ii) for the headquarters of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is authorized to designate not more than five individuals whose primary duty station is the Headquarters of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who are eligible to conduct a query using a United States person query term.”.
(b) Prohibition on warrantless queries for the communications of United States persons and persons located in the United States.—Section 702(f) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881a(f)), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
“(2) PROHIBITION ON WARRANTLESS QUERIES FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION OF UNITED STATES PERSONS AND PERSONS LOCATED IN THE UNITED STATES.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), no officer or employee of the United States may conduct a query of information acquired under this section in an effort to find communications or information the compelled production of which would require a probable cause warrant if sought for law enforcement purposes in the United States, of or about 1 or more United States persons or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or the time of the communication or creation of the information.
“(B) EXCEPTIONS FOR CONCURRENT AUTHORIZATION, CONSENT, EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, AND CERTAIN DEFENSIVE CYBERSECURITY QUERIES.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to a query related to a United States person or person reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or the time of the communication or creation of the information if—
“(I) such person is the subject of an order or emergency authorization authorizing electronic surveillance or physical search under section 105 or 304 of this Act, or a warrant issued pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing the conduct of the query;
“(II) (aa) the officer or employee carrying out the query has a reasonable belief that—
“(AA) an emergency exists involving an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm; and
“(BB) in order to prevent or mitigate this threat, the query must be conducted before authorization pursuant to subparagraph (I) can, with due diligence, be obtained; and
“(III) such person or, if such person is incapable of providing consent, a third party legally authorized to consent on behalf of such person, has provided consent to the query on a case-by-case basis; or
“(IV) (aa) the query uses a known cybersecurity threat signature as a query term;
“(bb) the query is conducted, and the results of the query are used, for the sole purpose of identifying targeted recipients of malicious software and preventing or mitigating harm from such malicious software;
“(ii) LIMITATIONS.—
“(I) USE IN SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS.—No information retrieved pursuant to a query authorized by clause (i)(II) or information derived from such query may be used, received in evidence, or otherwise disseminated in any investigation, trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or political subdivision thereof, except in proceedings or investigations that arise from the threat that prompted the query.
“(C) MATTERS RELATING TO EMERGENCY QUERIES.—
“(i) TREATMENT OF DENIALS.—In the event that a query for communications or information, the compelled production of which would require a probable cause warrant if sought for law enforcement purposes in the United States, of or about 1 more United States persons or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or the time of the communication or creation of the information is conducted pursuant to an emergency authorization described in subparagraph (B)(i)(I) and the application for such emergency authorization is denied, or in any other case in which the query has been conducted and no order is issued approving the query—
“(I) no information obtained or evidence derived from such query may be used, received in evidence, or otherwise disseminated in any investigation, trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or political subdivision thereof; and
“(II) no information concerning any United States person or person reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or the time of the communication or the creation of the information acquired from such query may subsequently be used or disclosed in any other manner without the consent of such person, except with the approval of the Attorney General if the information indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm to any person.
“(D) FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PURPOSE.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B)(i), no officer or employee of the United States may conduct a query of information acquired under this section in an effort to find information of or about 1 or more United States persons or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or the time of the communication or creation of the information unless the query is reasonably likely to retrieve foreign intelligence information.
“(3) DOCUMENTATION.—No officer or employee of the United States may conduct a query of information acquired under this section in an effort to find information of or about 1 or more United States persons or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of query or the time of the communication or the creation of the information, unless first an electronic record is created, and a system, mechanism, or business practice is in place to maintain such record, that includes the following:
“(4) PROHIBITION ON RESULTS OF METADATA QUERY AS A BASIS FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNICATIONS AND OTHER PROTECTED INFORMATION.—If a query of information acquired under this section is conducted in an effort to find communications metadata of 1 or more United States persons or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or communication and the query returns such metadata, the results of the query shall not be used as a basis for reviewing communications or information a query for which is otherwise prohibited under this section.
SEC. 3. Limitation on use of information obtained under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 relating to United States persons and persons located in the United States in criminal, civil, and administrative actions.
Paragraph (2) of section 706(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881e(a)) is amended to read as follows:
“(2) LIMITATION ON USE IN CRIMINAL, CIVIL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS.—No information acquired pursuant to section 702(f) of or about a United States person or person reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of acquisition or communication may be introduced as evidence against such person in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding or used as part of any criminal, civil, or administrative investigation, except—
“(B) in a proceeding or investigation in which the information is directly related to and necessary to address a specific threat of—
“(i) the commission of a Federal crime of terrorism under any of clauses (i) through (iii) of section 2332b(g)(5)(B) of title 18, United States Code;
“(ii) actions necessitating counterintelligence (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003));
“(iii) the proliferation or the use of a weapon of mass destruction (as defined in section 2332a(c) of title 18, United States Code);
“(v) incapacitation or destruction of critical infrastructure (as defined in section 1016(e) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)));
SEC. 4. Repeal of authority for the resumption of abouts collection.
(a) In general.—Section 702(b)(5) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881a(b)(5)) is amended by striking “, except as provided under section 103(b) of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017”.
(b) Conforming amendments.—
(1) FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978.—Section 702(m) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881a(m)) is amended—
(2) FISA AMENDMENTS REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2017.—Section 103 of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–118; 50 U.S.C. 1881a note) is amended—
SEC. 5. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court reform.
(a) Requirement for same judge to hear renewal applications.—Section 103(a)(1) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “To the extent practicable, no judge designated under this subsection shall hear a renewal application for electronic surveillance under this Act, which application was previously granted by another judge designated under this subsection, unless the term of the judge who granted the application has expired, or that judge is otherwise no longer serving on the court.”.
(b) Use of amici curiae in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court proceedings.—
(1) EXPANSION OF APPOINTMENT AUTHORITY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 103(i)(2) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)(2)) is amended—
(i) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:
“(A) shall, unless the court issues a finding that appointment is not appropriate, appoint 1 or more individuals who have been designated under paragraph (1), not fewer than 1 of whom possesses privacy and civil liberties expertise, unless the court finds that such a qualification is inappropriate, to serve as amicus curiae to assist the court in the consideration of any application or motion for an order or review that, in the opinion of the court—
“(ii) presents significant concerns with respect to the activities of a United States person that are protected by the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States;
(B) DEFINITION OF SENSITIVE INVESTIGATIVE MATTER.—Section 103(i) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(12) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term ‘sensitive investigative matter’ means—
“(A) an investigative matter involving the activities of—
“(i) a domestic public official or political candidate, or an individual serving on the staff of such an official or candidate;
(2) AUTHORITY TO SEEK REVIEW.—Section 103(i) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is amended—
(A) in paragraph (4)—
(ii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly;
(iii) in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated, by striking “the amicus curiae shall” and inserting the following: “the amicus curiae—
(iv) in subparagraph (A)(i), as so redesignated, by inserting before the semicolon at the end the following: “, including legal arguments regarding any privacy or civil liberties interest of any United States person that would be significantly impacted by the application or motion”; and
(v) by striking the period at the end and inserting the following: “; and
“(B) may seek leave to raise any novel or significant privacy or civil liberties issue relevant to the application or motion or other issue directly impacting the legality of the proposed electronic surveillance with the court, regardless of whether the court has requested assistance on that issue.”;
(C) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
“(7) AUTHORITY TO SEEK REVIEW OF DECISIONS.—
“(A) FISA COURT DECISIONS.—
“(i) PETITION.—Following issuance of an order under this Act by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, an amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2) may petition the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to certify for review to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review a question of law pursuant to subsection (j).
“(ii) WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REASONS.—If the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court denies a petition under this subparagraph, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court shall provide for the record a written statement of the reasons for the denial.
“(iii) APPOINTMENT.—Upon certification of any question of law pursuant to this subparagraph, the Court of Review shall appoint the amicus curiae to assist the Court of Review in its consideration of the certified question, unless the Court of Review issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate.
“(B) FISA COURT OF REVIEW DECISIONS.—An amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2) may petition the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review to certify for review to the Supreme Court of the United States any question of law pursuant to section 1254(2) of title 28, United States Code.
“(C) DECLASSIFICATION OF REFERRALS.—For purposes of section 602, a petition filed under subparagraph (A) or (B) of this paragraph and all of its content shall be considered a decision, order, or opinion issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review described in paragraph (2) of section 602(a).”.
(3) ACCESS TO INFORMATION.—
(A) APPLICATION AND MATERIALS.—Section 103(i)(6) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)(6)) is amended by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:
“(A) IN GENERAL.—
“(i) RIGHT OF AMICUS.—If a court established under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2), the amicus curiae—
“(I) shall have access, to the extent such information is available to the Government, to—
“(aa) the application, certification, petition, motion, and other information and supporting materials, including any information described in section 901, submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in connection with the matter in which the amicus curiae has been appointed, including access to any relevant legal precedent (including any such precedent that is cited by the Government, including in such an application);
(B) CLARIFICATION OF ACCESS TO CERTAIN INFORMATION.—Section 103(i)(6) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)(6)) is amended—
(ii) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following:
“(C) CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—An amicus curiae designated or appointed by the court shall have access, to the extent such information is available to the Government, to unredacted copies of each opinion, order, transcript, pleading, or other document of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, including, if the individual is eligible for access to classified information, any classified documents, information, and other materials or proceedings.”.
(4) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to proceedings under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) that take place on or after, or are pending on, that date.
SEC. 6. Application for an order approving electronic surveillance.
(a) Disclosure requirement.—Section 104(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1804(a)) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (6)(E)(ii), by inserting before the semicolon at the end “(and a description of such techniques)”;
(4) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
(b) Prohibition on use of certain information.—Section 104 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1804) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(c) Limitation on issuance of order.—Section 105(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1805(a)) is amended—
SEC. 7. Public disclosure and declassification of certain documents.
(a) Submission to Congress.—Section 601(c)(1) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1871(c)) is amended by inserting “, including declassified copies that have undergone review under section 602” before “; and”.
(b) Timeline for declassification review.—Section 602(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1872(a)) is amended—
SEC. 8. Transcriptions of proceedings; Attendance of certain Congressional officials at certain proceedings.
Section 103(c) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(c)) is amended—
(1) by striking “Proceedings under this Act” and inserting the following: “(1) Proceedings under this Act”;
(2) by striking “including applications made and orders granted” and inserting “including applications made, orders granted, and transcriptions of proceedings,”; and
(3) by adding at the end:
“(2) The chair and ranking minority member of each of the congressional intelligence committees and of the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate shall be entitled to attend any proceeding of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or any proceeding of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. Each person entitled to attend a proceeding pursuant to this paragraph may designate not more than 2 Members of Congress and not more than 2 staff members of such committee to attend on their behalf, pursuant to such procedures as the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence may establish. Not later than 45 days after any such proceeding, a copy of any application made, order granted, or transcription of the proceeding shall be made available for review to each person who is entitled to attend a proceeding pursuant to this paragraph or who is designated under this paragraph. Terms used in this paragraph have the meanings given such terms in section 701(b).”.
SEC. 9. Annual audit of FISA compliance by Inspector General.
(a) Report required.—Title VI of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1871 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 605. Annual audit of FISA compliance by Inspector General.
“Beginning with the first calendar year that begins after the effective date of this section, by not later than June 30th of that year and each year thereafter, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice shall conduct an audit on alleged violations and failures to comply with the requirements of this Act and any procedures established pursuant to this Act, and submit a report thereon to the congressional intelligence committees and the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“605. Annual audit of FISA compliance by Inspector General.”.
SEC. 10. Reporting on accuracy and completeness of applications.
Section 603 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1873) is amended—
SEC. 11. Annual report of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(a) Report required.—Title VI of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1871 et seq.), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 606. Annual report of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees and the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate—
“(1) a report on disciplinary activities taken by the Director to address violations of the requirements of law or the procedures established under this Act, including a comprehensive account of disciplinary investigations, including—
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“606. Annual report of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”.
SEC. 12. Extension of title VII of FISA; expiration of FISA authorities; effective dates.
(a) Effective dates.—Section 403(b) of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–261; 122 Stat. 2474) is amended—
(b) Conforming Amendments.—Section 404(b) of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–261; 122 Stat. 2476), is amended—
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “, as amended by section 101(a) and by the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017,” and inserting “, as most recently amended,”; and
SEC. 13. Criminal penalties for violations of FISA.
(a) In general.—Section 109 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1809) is amended as follows:
(1) ADDITIONAL OFFENSES.—In subsection (a)—
SEC. 14. Contempt power of FISC and FISC–R.
(a) In general.—Chapter 21 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in section 402, by inserting after “any district court of the United States” the following: “, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review,”; and
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections for such chapter is amended by inserting after the item pertaining to section 403 the following:
“404. Definitions.”.
(c) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of enactment, and annually thereafter the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (as such terms are defined in section 601(e) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) shall jointly submit to Congress a report on the exercise of authority under chapter 21 of title 18, United States Code, by such courts during the previous year.
SEC. 15. Increased penalties for civil actions.
(a) Increased penalties.—Section 110(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1810(a)) is amended to read as follows:
(b) Reporting requirement.—Title I of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is amended by inserting after section 110 the following:
“SEC. 110A. Reporting requirements for civil actions.
“(a) Report to Congress.—If a court finds that a person has violated this Act in a civil action under section 110, the head of the agency that employs that person shall report to Congress on the administrative action taken against that person pursuant to section 607 or any other provision of law.
“(b) FISC.—If a court finds that a person has violated this Act in a civil action under section 110, the head of the agency that employs that person shall report the name of such person to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court shall maintain a list of each person about whom it received a report under this subsection.”.
SEC. 16. Accountability procedures for incidents relating to queries conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(a) In general.—Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 709. Accountability procedures for incidents relating to queries conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
“(a) In general.—The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall establish procedures to hold employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation accountable for violations of law, guidance, and procedure governing queries of information acquired pursuant to section 702.
“(b) Elements.—The procedures established under subsection (a) shall include the following:
“(1) Centralized tracking of individual employee performance incidents involving negligent violations of law, guidance, and procedure described in subsection (a), over time.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 708 the following:
“709. Accountability procedures for incidents relating to queries conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”.
(c) Report required.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate and to the congressional intelligence committees (as such term is defined in section 801 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1885)) a report detailing the procedures established under section 709 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as added by subsection (a).
(2) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate and to the congressional intelligence committees (as such term is defined in section 801 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1885)) a report on any disciplinary actions taken pursuant to the procedures established under section 709 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as added by subsection (a), including a description of the circumstances surrounding each such disciplinary action, and the results of each such disciplinary action.
SEC. 17. Agency procedures to ensure compliance.
(a) Agency procedures to ensure compliance.—Title VI of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1871 et seq.), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 607. Agency procedures to ensure compliance.
“The head of each Federal department or agency authorized to acquire foreign intelligence information under this Act shall establish procedures—
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“607. Agency procedures to ensure compliance.”.
SEC. 18. Protection of records held by data brokers.
Section 2702 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(e) Prohibition on obtaining in exchange for anything of value certain records and information by law enforcement and intelligence agencies.—
“(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection—
“(A) the term ‘covered customer or subscriber record’ means a covered record that is—
“(B) the term ‘covered person’ means—
“(ii) a person—
“(II) who is a United States person, as defined in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801);
“(E) the term ‘illegitimately obtained information’ means a covered record that—
“(F) the term ‘intelligence community’ has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003);
“(G) the term ‘location information’ means information derived or otherwise calculated from the transmission or reception of a radio signal that reveals the approximate or actual geographic location of a customer, subscriber, or device;
“(H) the term ‘obtain in exchange for anything of value’ means to obtain by purchasing, to receive in connection with services being provided for consideration, or to otherwise obtain in exchange for consideration, including an access fee, service fee, maintenance fee, or licensing fee;
“(I) the term ‘online account’ means an online account with an electronic communication service to the public or remote computing service;
“(2) LIMITATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—A law enforcement agency of a governmental entity and an element of the intelligence community may not obtain from a third party in exchange for anything of value a covered customer or subscriber record or any illegitimately obtained information.
“(B) INDIRECTLY ACQUIRED RECORDS AND INFORMATION.—The limitation under subparagraph (A) shall apply without regard to whether the third party possessing the covered customer or subscriber record or illegitimately obtained information is the third party that initially obtained or collected, or is the third party that initially received the disclosure of, the covered customer or subscriber record or illegitimately obtained information.
“(3) LIMIT ON SHARING BETWEEN AGENCIES.—An agency of a governmental entity that is not a law enforcement agency or an element of the intelligence community may not provide to a law enforcement agency of a governmental entity or an element of the intelligence community a covered customer or subscriber record or illegitimately obtained information that was obtained from a third party in exchange for anything of value.
“(4) PROHIBITION ON USE AS EVIDENCE.—A covered customer or subscriber record or illegitimately obtained information obtained by or provided to a law enforcement agency of a governmental entity or an element of the intelligence community in violation of paragraph (2) or (3), and any evidence derived therefrom, may not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.
“(5) MINIMIZATION PROCEDURES.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall adopt specific procedures that are reasonably designed to minimize the acquisition and retention, and prohibit the dissemination, of information pertaining to a covered person that is acquired in violation of paragraph (2) or (3).
“(B) USE BY AGENCIES.—If a law enforcement agency of a governmental entity or element of the intelligence community acquires information pertaining to a covered person in violation of paragraph (2) or (3), the law enforcement agency of a governmental entity or element of the intelligence community shall minimize the acquisition and retention, and prohibit the dissemination, of the information in accordance with the procedures adopted under subparagraph (A).”.
Section 2703 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(i) Covered customer or subscriber records and illegitimately obtained information.—
“(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the terms ‘covered customer or subscriber record’, ‘illegitimately obtained information’, and ‘third party’ have the meanings given such terms in section 2702(e).
“(2) LIMITATION.—Unless a governmental entity obtains an order in accordance with paragraph (3), the governmental entity may not require a third party to disclose a covered customer or subscriber record or any illegitimately obtained information if a court order would be required for the governmental entity to require a provider of remote computing service or a provider of electronic communication service to the public to disclose such a covered customer or subscriber record or illegitimately obtained information that is a record of a customer or subscriber of the provider.
“(3) ORDERS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—A court may only issue an order requiring a third party to disclose a covered customer or subscriber record or any illegitimately obtained information on the same basis and subject to the same limitations as would apply to a court order to require disclosure by a provider of remote computing service or a provider of electronic communication service to the public of a record of a customer or subscriber of the provider.
“(B) STANDARD.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), a court shall apply the most stringent standard under Federal statute or the Constitution of the United States that would be applicable to a request for a court order to require a comparable disclosure by a provider of remote computing service or a provider of electronic communication service to the public of a record of a customer or subscriber of the provider.”.
SEC. 20. Intermediary service providers.
(a) Definition.—Section 2711 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Prohibition.—Section 2702(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(4) by adding at the end the following:
“(4) an intermediary service provider shall not knowingly divulge—
“(A) to any person or entity the contents of a communication while in electronic storage by that provider; or
“(B) to any governmental entity a record or other information pertaining to a subscriber to or customer of, a recipient of a communication from a subscriber to or customer of, or the sender of a communication to a subscriber to or customer of, the provider of electronic communication service to the public or the provider of remote computing service for, or on behalf of, which the intermediary service provider directly or indirectly delivers, transmits, stores, or processes communications.”.
SEC. 21. Limits on surveillance conducted for foreign intelligence purposes other than under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
(a) In general.—Section 2511(2)(f) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(f) (i) (A) Nothing contained in this chapter, chapter 121 or 206 of this title, or section 705 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) shall be deemed to affect an acquisition or activity described in clause (B) that is carried out utilizing a means other than electronic surveillance, as defined in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801).
“(B) An acquisition or activity described in this clause is—
“(I) an acquisition by the United States Government of foreign intelligence information from international or foreign communications that—
“(ii) The procedures in this chapter, chapter 121, and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) shall be the exclusive means by which electronic surveillance, as defined in section 101 of such Act, and the interception of domestic wire, oral, and electronic communications may be conducted.”.
(b) Exclusive means related to communications records.—The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) shall be the exclusive means by which electronic communications transactions records, call detail records, or other information from communications of United States persons or persons inside the United States are acquired for foreign intelligence purposes inside the United States or from a person or entity located in the United States that provides telecommunications, electronic communication, or remote computing services.
(c) Exclusive means related to location information, web browsing history, and internet search history.—
(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term “location information” has the meaning given that term in subsection (e) of section 2702 of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 2 of this Act.
(2) EXCLUSIVE MEANS.—Title I and sections 303, 304, 703, 704, and 705 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 1823, 1824, 1881b, 1881c, 1881d) shall be the exclusive means by which location information, web browsing history, and internet search history of United States persons or persons inside the United States are acquired for foreign intelligence purposes inside the United States or from a person or entity located in the United States.
(d) Exclusive means related to fourth amendment-Protected information.—Title I and sections 303, 304, 703, 704, and 705 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 1823, 1824, 1881b, 1881c, 1881d) shall be the exclusive means by which any information, records, data, or tangible things are acquired for foreign intelligence purposes from a person or entity located in the United States if the compelled production of such information, records, data, or tangible things would require a warrant for law enforcement purposes.
(e) Definition.—In this section, the term “United States person” has the meaning given that term in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801).
SEC. 22. Limit on civil immunity for providing information, facilities, or technical assistance to the Government absent a court order.
Section 2511(2)(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (ii), by striking clause (B) and inserting the following:
(2) by striking subparagraph (iii) and inserting the following:
“(iii) For assistance provided pursuant to a certification under subparagraph (ii)(B), the limitation on causes of action under the last sentence of the matter following subparagraph (ii)(B) shall only apply to the extent that the assistance ceased at the earliest of the time the application for a court order was denied, the time the communication sought was obtained, or 48 hours after the interception began.”.
SEC. 23. Prohibition on reverse targeting of United States persons and persons located in the United States.
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881a) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(2)—
(B) in subparagraph (A), as designated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking “if the purpose of such acquisition is to target a particular, known person reasonably believed to be in the United States;” and inserting the following: if a significant purpose of such acquisition is to acquire the information of 1 or more United States persons or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of acquisition or communication, unless—
“(i) (I) there is a reasonable belief that an emergency exists involving an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm to such United States person or person reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or the time of acquisition or communication;
“(ii) the United States person or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of acquisition or communication has provided consent to the targeting, or if such person is incapable of providing consent, a third party legally authorized to consent on behalf of such person has provided consent; and
“(B) in the case of information acquired pursuant to subparagraph (A)(i) or evidence derived from such targeting, be used, received in evidence, or otherwise disseminated in any investigation, trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, office, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or political subdivision thereof, except in proceedings or investigations that arise from the threat that prompted the targeting;”;
(2) in subsection (d)(1), by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
(3) in subsection (h)(2)(A)(i), by amending subclause (I) to read as follows:
SEC. 24. Required disclosure of relevant information in foreign intelligence surveillance act of 1978 applications.
(a) In general.—The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 901. Certification regarding accuracy procedures.
“(a) Definition of accuracy procedures.—In this section, the term ‘accuracy procedures’ means specific procedures, adopted by the Attorney General, to ensure that an application for a court order under this Act, including any application for renewal of an existing order, is accurate and complete, including procedures that ensure, at a minimum, that—
“(1) the application reflects all information that might reasonably call into question the accuracy of the information or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application, or otherwise raises doubts about the requested findings;
“(2) the application reflects all material information that might reasonably call into question the reliability and reporting of any information from a confidential human source that is used in the application;
“(4) the applicant coordinates with the appropriate elements of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)), concerning any prior or existing relationship with the target of any surveillance, search, or other means of investigation, and discloses any such relationship in the application;
“(b) Statement and certification of accuracy procedures.—Any Federal officer making an application for a court order under this Act shall include with the application—
“(1) a description of the accuracy procedures employed by the officer or the officer’s designee; and
“(2) a certification that the officer or the officer’s designee has collected and reviewed for accuracy and completeness—
“(c) Necessary finding for court orders.—A judge may not enter an order under this Act unless the judge finds, in addition to any other findings required under this Act, that the accuracy procedures described in the application for the order, as required under subsection (b)(1), are actually accuracy procedures as defined in this section.”.
SEC. 25. Enhanced annual reports by Director of National Intelligence.
(a) In general.—Subsection (b) of section 603 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1873(b)) is amended—
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
“(3) a description of the subject matter of each of the certifications provided under section 702(h);
(4) in paragraph (9) (as redesignated in paragraph (2) of this subsection), by striking “and” at the end;
(5) in paragraph (10) (as redesignated in paragraph (2) of this subsection), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon;
(6) by adding at the end the following:
“(11) (A) the total number of disseminated intelligence reports derived from collection pursuant to section 702 containing the identities of United States persons regardless of whether the identities of the United States persons were openly included or masked;
“(B) the total number of disseminated intelligence reports derived from collection not authorized by this Act containing the identities of United States persons regardless of whether the identities of the United States persons were openly included or masked;
“(C) the total number of disseminated intelligence reports derived from collection pursuant to section 702 containing the identities of United States persons in which the identities of the United States persons were masked;
“(D) the total number of disseminated intelligence reports derived from collection not authorized by this Act containing the identities of United States persons in which the identities of the United States persons were masked;
“(12) the number of queries conducted in an effort to find communications or information of or about 1 or more United States persons or persons reasonably believed to be located in the United States at the time of the query or the time of the communication or creation of the information, where such communications or information were obtained without a court order, subpoena, or other legal process established by statute;
“(13) the number of criminal proceedings in which the Federal Government or a government of a State or political subdivision thereof entered into evidence or otherwise used or disclosed in a criminal proceeding any information obtained or derived from an acquisition conducted without a court order, subpoena, or other legal process established by statute; and
“(14) a good faith estimate of what percentage of the communications that are subject to the procedures described in section 309(b)(3) of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (50 U.S.C. 1813(b)(3))—
Section 707 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881f) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(c) Quarterly report.—The Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit a report, each quarter, to the congressional intelligence committees and to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and of the House of Representatives, which shall include, for that quarter, the following:
“(1) The total number of warrants issued to conduct a query of information acquired under section 702.
“(2) The total number of times a query was conducted pursuant to an exception under section 702(f)(2)(B) and which exceptions applied.
“(3) The total number of queries of information acquired under section 702 that were conducted using a United States person query term or a query term pertaining to a person reasonably believed to be present in the United States as of the date such query was conducted, disaggregated by the agency that conducted the queries.”.
Union Calendar No. 248 | |||||
| |||||
[Report No. 118–307, Part I] | |||||
A BILL | |||||
To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to reform certain authorities and to provide greater transparency and oversight. | |||||
December 11, 2023 | |||||
Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary with an amendment | |||||
December 11, 2023 | |||||
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed |