H.R. 1631 Text - Reported in House - 118th Congress (2023-2024)

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) Congress, the executive branch, and State and local governments have long recognized that the people of the United States benefit greatly from the work of private standards development organizations with expertise in highly specialized areas.

(2) The organizations described in paragraph (1) create technical standards and voluntary consensus standards through a process requiring openness, balance, consensus, and due process to ensure all interested parties have an opportunity to participate in standards development.

(3) The standards that result from the process described in paragraph (2) are used by private industry, academia, the Federal Government, and State and local governments that incorporate those standards by reference into laws and regulations.

(4) The standards described in paragraph (3) further innovation, commerce, and public safety, all without cost to governments or taxpayers because standards development organizations fund the process described in paragraph (2) through the sale and licensing of their standards.

(5) Congress and the executive branch have repeatedly declared that, wherever possible, governments should rely on voluntary consensus standards and have set forth policies and procedures by which those standards are incorporated by reference into laws and regulations and that balance the interests of access with protection for copyright.

(6) Circular A–119 of the Office of Management and Budget entitled “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities”, issued in revised form on January 27, 2016, recognizes the benefits of voluntary consensus standards and incorporation by reference, stating that “[i]f a standard is used and published in an agency document, your agency must observe and protect the rights of the copyright holder and meet any other similar obligations.”.

(7) Federal agencies have relied extensively on the incorporation by reference system to leverage the value of technical standards and voluntary consensus standards for the benefit of the public, resulting in more than 23,000 sections in the Code of Federal Regulations that incorporate by reference technical and voluntary consensus standards.

(8) State and local governments have also recognized that technical standards and voluntary consensus standards are critical to protecting public health and safety, which has resulted in many such governments—

(A) incorporating those standards by reference into their laws and regulations; or

(B) entering into license agreements with standards development organizations to use the standards created by those organizations.

(9) Standards development organizations rely on copyright protection to generate the revenues necessary to fund the voluntary consensus process and to continue creating and updating these important standards.

(10) The people of the United States have a strong interest in—

(A) ensuring that standards development organizations continue to utilize a voluntary consensus process—

(i) in which all interested parties can participate; and

(ii) that continues to create and update standards in a timely manner to—

(I) account for technological advances;

(II) address new threats to public health and safety; and

(III) improve the usefulness of those standards; and

(B) the provision of access that allows people to read technical and voluntary consensus standards that are incorporated by reference into laws and regulations.

(11) As of the date of enactment of this Act, many standards development organizations make their standards available to the public free of charge online in a manner that does not substantially disrupt the ability of those organizations to earn revenue from the industries and professionals that purchase copies and subscription-access to those standards (such as through read-only access), which ensures that the public may read the current, accurate version of such a standard without significantly interfering with the revenue model that has long supported those organizations and their creation of, and investment in, new standards.

(12) Through this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, Congress intends to balance the goals of furthering the creation of standards and ensuring public access to standards that are incorporated by reference into law or regulation.

SEC. 3. Works incorporated by reference into law.

(a) In general.—Chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“§ 123. Works incorporated by reference into law

“(a) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) CIRCULAR A–119.—The term ‘Circular A–119’ means Circular A–119 of the Office of Management and Budget entitled ‘Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities’, issued in revised form on January 27, 2016.

“(2) INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.—

“(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘incorporated by reference’ means, with respect to a standard, that the text of a Federal, State, local, or municipal law or regulation—

“(i) references all or part of the standard; and

“(ii) does not copy the text of that standard directly into that law or regulation.

“(B) APPLICATION.—The creation or publication of a work that includes both the text of a law or regulation and all or part of a standard that has been incorporated by reference, as described in subparagraph (A), shall not affect the status of the standard as incorporated by reference under that subparagraph.

“(3) STANDARD.—The term ‘standard’ means a standard or code that is—

“(A) a technical standard, as that term is defined in section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note); or

“(B) a voluntary consensus standard, as that term is used for the purposes of Circular A–119.

“(4) STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION.—The term ‘standards development organization’ means a holder of a copyright under this title that plans, develops, establishes, or coordinates voluntary consensus standards using procedures that incorporate the attributes of openness, balance of interests, due process, an appeals process, and consensus in a manner consistent with the requirements of Circular A–119.

“(5) PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE ONLINE.—

“(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘publicly accessible online’, with respect to material, means that the material is displayed for review in a readily accessible manner on a public website that conforms with the accessibility requirements of section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d), including the regulations implementing that section as set forth in part 1194 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation.

“(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—If a user is required to create an account or agree to the terms of service of a website or organization in order to access material online, that requirement shall not be construed to render the material not publicly accessible online for the purposes of subparagraph (A), if—

“(i) there is no monetary cost to the user to access that material; and

“(ii) no personally identifiable information collected pursuant to such a requirement is used without the affirmative and express consent of the user.

“(b) Standards incorporated by reference into law or regulation.—A standard to which copyright protection subsists under section 102(a) at the time of its fixation shall retain such protection, notwithstanding that the standard is incorporated by reference, if the applicable standards development organization, within a reasonable period of time after obtaining actual or constructive notice that the standard has been incorporated by reference, makes all portions of the standard so incorporated publicly accessible online at no monetary cost and in a format that includes a searchable table of contents and index, or equivalent aids to facilitate the location of specific content.

“(c) Burden of proof.—In any proceeding in which a party asserts that a standards development organization has failed to comply with the requirements under subsection (b) for retaining copyright protection with respect to a standard, the burden of proof shall be on the party making that assertion to prove that the standards development organization has failed to comply with those requirements.”.

(b) PRO Codes Act Reporting Requirement.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The United States Copyright Office is required to prepare and submit a comprehensive report to the House Judiciary Committee, which shall include—

(A) a detailed assessment of this Act’s effect on case law;

(B) an analysis of this Act’s effectiveness in achieving its stated goals;

(C) a review of any challenges or obstacles encountered during the implementation process;

(D) recommendations for legislative or regulatory modifications to improve the effectiveness of this Act; and

(E) an overview of the impact of this Act on the public, including access to legal information and compliance costs for governments, businesses, and individuals.

(2) TIMELINE FOR SUBMISSION.—

(A) The initial report must be submitted within two years of the enactment of this Act.

(B) Subsequent reports shall be submitted every five years on the anniversary of the first report’s submission.

(c) GAO Study on Disadvantaged Communities.—

(1) STUDY DIRECTED.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the potential disparate impact of this Act on historically disadvantaged communities.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—The study shall include, but not be limited to:

(A) An analysis of how limited access to technical standards incorporated in the PRO Codes Act could disproportionately hinder the ability of historically disadvantaged communities to assert their legal rights and advocate for legal reforms.

(B) An assessment of how the potential costs associated with accessing standards could create additional barriers for residents of historically disadvantaged communities seeking to understand and enforce their rights.

(C) An examination of potential disparities in outcomes for historically disadvantaged communities arising from the implementation of the PRO Codes Act.

(D) Recommendations on ways to mitigate any identified disparate impacts on historically disadvantaged communities.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within two years of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study on the impact of PRO Codes on historically disadvantaged communities from paragraphs (1) and (2).

(d) Study of Costs for States, Cities, Municipalities, Counties, Special Districts, Associated with Standards Incorporated by Reference (SIBR).—

(1) REQUIREMENT FOR COST ANALYSIS.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a comprehensive study of the costs associated with the implementation of this Act. This study will encompass levels of government, including state, cities, municipalities, counties, and special district governments, to ensure a complete understanding of the potential financial impact.

(2) SCOPE OF ANALYSIS.—The analysis shall include, but not be limited to:

(A) Fees charged by Standard Development Organizations to state, cities, municipalities, counties, and special district governments for access to standards incorporated by reference.

(B) An analysis of indirect costs to state, cities, municipalities, counties, and special district governments associated with compliance with this Act.

(3) REPORTING.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within two years of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the cost analysis required under paragraph (2). The report shall include recommendations on potential actions to improve cost-effectiveness related to SIBRs.

(e) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on Consumers.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the potential impact of this Act on consumers.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Implications for consumer protection under this Act.

(B) Potential for increased costs or confusion among consumers due to new regulations.

(C) Accessibility of information about rights and protections for consumers under this Act.

(D) Recommendations to enhance consumer protection and information accessibility.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within one year of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study on the impact of this Act on consumers.

(f) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on Digital Privacy and Data Protection.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the potential impact of this Act on digital privacy and data protection.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Analysis of how this Act affects the protection of personal data.

(B) Evaluation of the Act's compliance requirements related to data security.

(C) Recommendations for strengthening digital privacy protections.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within 18 months of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study on the impact of this Act on digital privacy and data protection.

(g) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on access to the law.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the impact of this Act specifically on platforms that offer legal codes online at no cost to the public. The study will assess how the Act influences these platforms' operations and the public's access to and understanding of the law.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Assessment of how this Act influences the operations of online platforms that provide public access to legal codes and other regulatory documents.

(B) Evaluation of the Act’s provisions that may limit or enhance public accessibility to legal information via these platforms.

(C) Analysis of potential barriers introduced by the Act that could hinder public understanding of legal standards and codes.

(D) Recommendations for amendments or new provisions to ensure continued and enhanced public access to legal codes and standards, fostering transparency and legal literacy.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within two years of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study.

(h) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on inclusive of accessibility and usability standards for people with disabilities.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the impact of this Act on disabled populations, specifically assessing whether the Act’s definition of “publicly accessible” is sufficiently inclusive of accessibility and usability standards for people with disabilities.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Evaluation of how the accessibility provisions of this Act impact the ability of people with disabilities to access and use public codes and standards.

(B) Examination of current gaps in accessibility that may prevent full participation of disabled individuals in public and legal affairs as affected by the Act.

(C) Recommendations to ensure this Act aligns with federal accessibility standards and effectively serves the needs of the disabled community.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within 18 months of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study on the accessibility of this Act for disabled populations.

(i) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on Affordable Housing.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the potential impact of this Act on the development and accessibility of affordable housing.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Analysis of this Act's impact on the costs and regulatory barriers to building affordable housing.

(B) Evaluation of the Act’s impact on the availability of affordable housing units in urban and rural areas.

(C) Assessment of the Act's cost on affordable housing projects.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within two years of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study on the impact of this Act on affordable housing.

(j) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on SDO Access Conditions.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on whether Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) condition access to standards under this Act by requiring users to create accounts, agree to restrictive terms of service, or meet other potentially burdensome conditions.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Assessment of the extent to which SDOs impose conditions that could restrict public access to standards and legal codes, such as account creation, agreement to terms of service, or other barriers.

(B) Evaluation of the impact of these conditions on the public’s ability to freely access, distribute, share, and print essential legal information.

(C) Analysis of potential violations of the fundamental principle that laws should be accessible without undue restrictions, considering the implications for transparency and accountability.

(D) Recommendations for legislative or regulatory measures to ensure that access to legal information under this Act is not conditioned on undue or discriminatory terms.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within 18 months of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study.

(k) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on Executive Compensation at SDOs.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on executive compensation within Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), particularly those with substantial revenue streams and tax-exempt status.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Analysis of the revenue sources of large SDOs, including details on income from sales of publications, fees for training and certification services, and membership dues.

(B) Examination of the scale of executive compensation at these organizations, including total executive compensation as a proportion of total revenues and in comparison to industry standards.

(C) Evaluation of the governance practices related to executive compensation at SDOs, including transparency, accountability, and alignment with nonprofit organization standards.

(D) Recommendations for potential regulatory or legislative actions to ensure that executive compensation at tax-exempt SDOs remains within reasonable limits and aligns with best practices for nonprofit management.

(3) SUBMISSION.—The Comptroller General shall submit this report to Congress within 18 months of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO.

(l) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) study on this Act and homeowner costs for building code access.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on how this Act would affect the costs imposed on homeowners' access to building codes.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Examination of the financial impact on homeowners, particularly focusing on how these costs might deter necessary maintenance, safety upgrades, and other costs associated with renovations.

(B) Evaluation of how this Act would affect the availability and affordability of building codes across different regions and income groups.

(C) Recommendations for improving this Act to make building codes more accessible and affordable for homeowners.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within 18 months of the enactment of this Act.

(m) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Small Businesses.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the potential impact of this Act on small businesses.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) The extent to which compliance burdens are affected by this Act.

(B) Analysis of small businesses' ability to compete with larger entities under the new regulatory framework.

(C) Availability and effectiveness of legal resources for small businesses navigating this Act.

(D) Recommendations to mitigate any identified negative impacts on small businesses.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within one year of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study on the impact of this Act on small businesses.

(n) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Study on First Amendment Rights.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the potential impact of this Act on First Amendment rights, specifically the public’s ability to access, read, share, and debate the law, including codes incorporated by reference.

(2) ELEMENTS OF THE STUDY.—

(A) Analysis of how this Act may lead standard development organizations to place the law behind paywalls, thus restricting public access to essential legal information and potentially violating First Amendment rights.

(B) Evaluation of the economic, legal, and social impacts of restricting public access to codes and standards referenced in the Act.

(C) Examination of precedents and legal interpretations regarding public access to laws and how they align with First Amendment protections.

(D) Recommendations for legislative or regulatory changes to ensure that all laws and standards referenced in the Act are accessible without undue financial or procedural barriers.

(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall submit a report to Congress within one year of the enactment of this Act, detailing the findings of the GAO Study on the impact of this Act on First Amendment rights.

(o) Technical and conforming amendment.—The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“123. Works incorporated by reference into law.”.