Union Calendar No. 271
117th CONGRESS 2d Session |
[Report No. 117–359]
To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to make supplemental funds available for management of fish and wildlife species of greatest conservation need as determined by State fish and wildlife agencies, and for other purposes.
April 22, 2021
Mrs. Dingell (for herself, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Hill, Miss González-Colón, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Huffman, Mr. DeFazio, and Ms. Pingree) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
June 9, 2022
Additional sponsors: Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Cole, Ms. Craig, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, Mr. O'Halleran, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Crow, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Levin of California, Ms. DelBene, Ms. Kuster, Mr. Kustoff, Mr. Lamb, Ms. Salazar, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Ms. Leger Fernandez, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Ms. Schrier, Mr. Malinowski, Mr. Veasey, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Courtney, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Crist, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Evans, Mr. Upton, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Long, Ms. Ross, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Scanlon, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Wild, Ms. Norton, Mr. Brown of Maryland, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Pappas, Mrs. Axne, Mr. Himes, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Ms. Strickland, Mrs. Lawrence, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Carson, Ms. Chu, Ms. Titus, Mr. Vela, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Horsford, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Lawson of Florida, Mrs. Fletcher, Ms. Barragán, Mr. Morelle, Ms. Brownley, Mr. Amodei, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. Soto, Mr. Huizenga, Ms. Jacobs of California, Mr. Aguilar, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Levin of Michigan, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Katko, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Kahele, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Walberg, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Lieu, Mr. Allred, Ms. Dean, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Trone, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Houlahan, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Harder of California, Mr. Gallego, Ms. Manning, Mr. Kind, Ms. Stansbury, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Keller, Mr. Welch, Mr. Correa, Mrs. Trahan, Mrs. Radewagen, Mrs. Hartzler, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Neguse, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Adams, Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio, Mr. McEachin, Ms. Newman, Mr. Casten, Mr. Comer, Mr. Gimenez, Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Stanton, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Sablan, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Young, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Neal, Mr. Murphy of North Carolina, Mrs. Bustos, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Ms. Williams of Georgia, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Perlmutter, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Rush, Mr. Auchincloss, Mr. García of Illinois, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Schrader, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Matsui, Ms. Brown of Ohio, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. McNerney, Ms. Porter, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Valadao, Ms. Spanberger, Mr. Turner, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. Sherrill, Mr. Cuellar, Ms. Escobar, Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Carter of Louisiana, Mr. Kim of New Jersey, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Keating, Mr. Golden, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Garbarino, Ms. Slotkin, Mr. Budd, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Ms. Sánchez
June 9, 2022
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 22, 2021]
To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to make supplemental funds available for management of fish and wildlife species of greatest conservation need as determined by State fish and wildlife agencies, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SEC. 101. Wildlife conservation and restoration subaccount.
(a) In general.—Section 3 of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669b) is amended in subsection (c)—
(2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF SUBACCOUNT.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—There is established in the fund a subaccount to be known as the ‘Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Subaccount’ (referred to in this section as the ‘Subaccount’).
“(2) SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT.—Amounts transferred to the Subaccount shall supplement, but not replace, existing funds available to the States from—
“(3) INNOVATION GRANTS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall distribute 10 percent of funds apportioned from the Subaccount through a competitive grant program to State fish and wildlife departments, the District of Columbia fish and wildlife department, fish and wildlife departments of territories, or to regional associations of fish and wildlife departments (or any group composed of more than 1 such entity).
“(B) PURPOSE.—Such grants shall be provided for the purpose of catalyzing innovation of techniques, tools, strategies, or collaborative partnerships that accelerate, expand, or replicate effective and measurable recovery efforts for species of greatest conservation need and species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the habitats of such species.
“(D) SUPPORT FROM UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.—The United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall provide any personnel or administrative support services necessary for such Committee to carry out its responsibilities under this Act.
“(E) EVALUATION.—Such committee shall evaluate each proposal submitted under this paragraph and recommend projects for funding, giving preference to solutions that accelerate the recovery of species identified as priorities through regional scientific assessments of species of greatest conservation need.
“(F) SPECIAL RULE BEFORE DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS FROM SUBACCOUNT.—In any fiscal year that begins before the first disbursement of funds from the Subaccount, any nonprofit organization that actively participates in carrying out wildlife conservation restoration activities shall be deemed to fulfill the requirement described in subparagraph (C)(iii).
“(4) USE OF FUNDS.—Funds apportioned from the Subaccount—
“(A) shall be used to implement the Wildlife Conservation Strategy of a State, territory, or the District of Columbia, as required under section 4(e), by carrying out, revising, or enhancing existing wildlife and habitat conservation and restoration programs and developing and implementing new wildlife conservation and restoration programs to recover and manage species of greatest conservation need and the key habitats and plant community types essential to the conservation of those species as determined by the appropriate State fish and wildlife department;
“(B) shall be used to develop, revise, and enhance the Wildlife Conservation Strategy of a State, territory, or the District of Columbia, as may be required by this Act;
“(C) shall be used to assist in the recovery of species found in the State, territory, or the District of Columbia that are listed as endangered species, threatened species, candidate species or species proposed for listing, or species petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 or under State law;
“(D) may be used for wildlife conservation education and wildlife-associated recreation projects, especially in historically underserved communities;
“(E) may be used to manage a species of greatest conservation need whose range is shared with another State, territory, Indian Tribe, or foreign government and for the conservation of the habitat of such species;
“(5) MINIMUM REQUIRED SPENDING FOR ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY.—Not less than an average of 15 percent over a 5-year period of amounts apportioned to a State, territory, or the District of Columbia from the Subaccount shall be used for purposes described in paragraph (4)(C). The Secretary may reduce the minimum requirement of a State, territory, or the District of Columbia on an annual basis if the Secretary determines that the State, territory, or the District of Columbia is meeting the conservation and recovery needs of all species described in paragraph (4)(C).
“(6) PUBLIC ACCESS TO PRIVATE LANDS NOT REQUIRED.—Funds apportioned from the Subaccount shall not be conditioned upon the provision of public access to private lands, waters, or holdings.
“(7) REQUIREMENTS FOR MATCHING FUNDS.—
“(A) For the purposes of the non-Federal fund matching requirement for a wildlife conservation or restoration program or project funded by the Subaccount, a State, territory, or the District of Columbia may use as matching non-Federal funds—
“(i) funds from Federal agencies other than the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture;
“(B) Revenue described in subparagraph (A)(iii) may only be used to fulfill the requirements of such non-Federal fund matching requirement if—
“(i) no Federal funds apportioned to the State fish and wildlife department of such State from the Wildlife Restoration Program or the Sport Fish Restoration Program have been reverted because of a failure to fulfill such non-Federal fund matching requirement by such State during the previous 2 fiscal years; and
“(8) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—Of the funds authorized under this subsection, not more than 3 percent may be used by the Secretary for administrative costs.
“(9) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the following definitions apply:
“(A) PARTNERSHIPS.—The term ‘partnerships’ may include collaborative efforts with Federal agencies, State agencies, local agencies, Indian Tribes, nonprofit organizations, academic institutions, industry groups, and private individuals to implement a State’s Wildlife Conservation Strategy.
“(B) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED.—The term ‘species of greatest conservation need’ may be fauna or flora, and may include terrestrial, aquatic, marine, and invertebrate species that are of low population, declining, rare, or facing threats and in need of conservation attention, as determined by each State fish and wildlife department, with respect to funds apportioned to such State.
(b) Oversight and accountability.—Section 3 of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669b) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(e) To the Office of Inspector General, for the purposes of oversight and accountability with respect to the expenditure of funds authorized under subsection (c), there is authorized to be appropriated, until September 30, 2029, 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the amounts made available under such subsection.”.
(c) Allocation and Apportionment of available amounts.—Section 4 of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669c) is amended—
(1) in subsection (d)—
(A) in paragraph (1)—
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “to the District of Columbia and to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, each” and inserting “To the District of Columbia”;
(C) by amending paragraph (2)(B) to read as follows:
(2) in subsection (e)(4)—
(A) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows:
“(B) Not more than an average of 15 percent over a 5-year period of amounts apportioned to each State, territory, or the District of Columbia under this section for a wildlife conservation and restoration program may be used for wildlife conservation education and wildlife-associated recreation.”; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
“(C) $55 million shall be reserved for States and territories that include plants among their species of greatest conservation need and in the conservation planning and habitat prioritization efforts of their Wildlife Conservation Strategy. Each eligible State, territory, or the District of Columbia shall receive an additional 5 percent of their apportioned amount. Any unallocated resources shall be allocated proportionally among all States and territories under the formulas of this section.”; and
(3) by adding at the end following:
“(f) Minimization of planning and reporting.—Nothing in this Act shall be interpreted to require a State to create a comprehensive strategy related to conservation education or outdoor recreation.
“(g) Accountability.—Not more than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Recovering America’s Wildlife Act of 2021 and every 3 years thereafter, each State fish and wildlife department of a State or territory that receives funding under subsection (c) shall submit a 3-year work plan and budget for implementing its Wildlife Conservation Strategy and a report describing the results derived from activities accomplished under subsection (c)(4) during the previous 3 years to—
SEC. 102. Technical amendments.
(a) Definitions.—Section 2 of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669a) is amended—
(b) Conforming amendments.—The Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669a et seq.) is amended—
(3) in section 8 (16 U.S.C. 669g), in subsection (a), by striking “Account” and inserting “Subaccount”.
The Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669 et seq.) is amended—
(2) by inserting after section 12 the following:
“Nothing in this Act shall be construed to enlarge or diminish the authority, jurisdiction, or responsibility of a State to manage, control, or regulate fish and wildlife under the law and regulations of the State on lands and waters within the State, including on Federal lands and waters.
“SEC. 14. Statutory construction with respect to Alaska.
“If any conflict arises between any provision of this Act and any provision of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act or the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, then the provision in the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act or the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act shall prevail.”.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ACCOUNT.—The term “Account” means the Tribal Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Account established by subsection (b)(1).
(2) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term “Indian Tribe” has the meaning given such term in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304).
(4) TRIBAL SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED.—The term “Tribal species of greatest conservation need” means any species identified by an Indian Tribe as requiring conservation management because of declining population, habitat loss, or other threats, or because of their biological or cultural importance to such Tribe.
(5) WILDLIFE.—The term “wildlife” means—
(b) Tribal wildlife conservation and restoration account.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established in the Treasury an account to be known as the “Tribal Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Account”.
(c) Distribution of funds to Indian tribes.—Each fiscal year, the Secretary of the Treasury shall deposit funds into the Account and distribute such funds through a noncompetitive application process according to guidelines and criteria, and reporting requirements determined by the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, in consultation with Indian Tribes. Such funds shall remain available until expended.
(d) Wildlife management responsibilities.—The distribution guidelines and criteria described in subsection (c) shall be based, in part, upon an Indian Tribe’s wildlife management responsibilities. Any funding allocated to Indian Tribes in Alaska may only be used in a manner consistent with the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, and the Alaska Statehood Act. Alaska Native Corporations or Tribes may enter into cooperative agreements with the State of Alaska on conservation projects of mutual concern.
(e) Use of funds.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary may distribute funds from the Account to an Indian Tribe for any of the following purposes:
(A) To develop, carry out, revise, or enhance wildlife conservation and restoration programs to manage Tribal species of greatest conservation need and the habitats of such species as determined by the Indian Tribe.
(B) To assist in the recovery of species listed as an endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
(D) To manage a Tribal species of greatest conservation need and the habitat of such species, the range of which may be shared with a foreign country, State, or other Indian Tribe.
(E) To manage, control, and prevent invasive species as well as diseases and other risks to wildlife.
(F) For law enforcement activities that are directly related to the protection and conservation of wildlife.
(2) CONDITIONS ON THE USE OF FUNDS.—
(A) REQUIRED USE OF FUNDS.—In order to be eligible to receive funds under subsection (c), a Tribe’s application must include a proposal to use funds for at least 1 of the purposes described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1).
(B) IMPERILED SPECIES RECOVERY.—In distributing funds under this section, the Secretary shall distribute not less than 15 percent of the total funds distributed to proposals to fund the recovery of a species, subspecies, or distinct population segment listed as a threatened species, endangered species, or candidate species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) or Tribal law.
(f) No matching funds required.—No Indian Tribe shall be required to provide matching funds to be eligible to receive funds under this Act.
(g) Public access not required.—Funds apportioned from the Tribal Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Account shall not be conditioned upon the provision of public or non-Tribal access to Tribal or private lands, waters, or holdings.
(h) Administrative costs.—Of the funds deposited under subsection (b)(3) for each fiscal year, not more than 3 percent shall be used by the Secretary for administrative costs.
(i) Oversight and accountability.—To the Office of Inspector General, for the purposes of oversight and accountability with respect to the expenditure of funds authorized under this title, there is authorized to be appropriated, until September 30, 2029, 1⁄2 of 1 percent of the amounts made available under this title.
(j) Savings clause.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed as modifying or abrogating a treaty with any Indian Tribe, or as enlarging or diminishing the authority, jurisdiction, or responsibility of an Indian Tribe to manage, control, or regulate wildlife. If any conflict arises between any provision of this Act and any provision of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act or the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, then the provision in the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act or the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act shall prevail.
Union Calendar No. 271 | |||||
| |||||
[Report No. 117–359] | |||||
A BILL | |||||
To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to make supplemental funds available for management of fish and wildlife species of greatest conservation need as determined by State fish and wildlife agencies, and for other purposes. | |||||
June 9, 2022 | |||||
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed |