Bill Sponsor
House Bill 1164
116th Congress(2019-2020)
Electronic Court Records Reform Act of 2019
Introduced
Introduced
Introduced in House on Feb 13, 2019
Overview
Text
Introduced in House 
Feb 13, 2019
Not Scanned for Linkage
About Linkage
Multiple bills can contain the same text. This could be an identical bill in the opposite chamber or a smaller bill with a section embedded in a larger bill.
Bill Sponsor regularly scans bill texts to find sections that are contained in other bill texts. When a matching section is found, the bills containing that section can be viewed by clicking "View Bills" within the bill text section.
Bill Sponsor is currently only finding exact word-for-word section matches. In a future release, partial matches will be included.
Introduced in House(Feb 13, 2019)
Feb 13, 2019
Not Scanned for Linkage
About Linkage
Multiple bills can contain the same text. This could be an identical bill in the opposite chamber or a smaller bill with a section embedded in a larger bill.
Bill Sponsor regularly scans bill texts to find sections that are contained in other bill texts. When a matching section is found, the bills containing that section can be viewed by clicking "View Bills" within the bill text section.
Bill Sponsor is currently only finding exact word-for-word section matches. In a future release, partial matches will be included.
H. R. 1164 (Introduced-in-House)


116th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1164


To direct the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to consolidate the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system, and for other purposes.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 13, 2019

Mr. Collins of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Quigley, Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee, and Mr. Johnson of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


A BILL

To direct the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts to consolidate the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Electronic Court Records Reform Act of 2019”.

SEC. 2. Consolidation of the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system.

(a) In general.—Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in coordination with the Administrator of General Services, shall consolidate the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system, and shall develop one system for all filings with courts of the United States, which shall be administered by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

(b) Use of technology.—In developing the system under subsection (a), the Director shall use modern technology in order—

(1) to improve security, data accessibility, affordability, and performance; and

(2) to minimize the burden on pro se litigants.

(c) Availability to States.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may choose to participate in the system developed under this section.

(2) FEE.—The Director shall charge a fee to a State that chooses to participate in the system, which is set at a level to recover the cost of providing the services associated with the administration and maintenance of the system to the State.

SEC. 3. Public Access to Court Electronic Records system requirements.

(a) In general.—Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in coordination with the Administrator of General Services, shall update the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system, which shall be subject to the following requirements:

(1) A document filed with a court shall be made publicly accessible upon filing, except as ordered by a court or by rule of the Judicial Conference.

(2) All documents on the system shall be available to the public and to parties before the court free of charge.

(3) Any information that is prohibited from public disclosure by law or court order shall be redacted.

(4) All documents shall be text-searchable and machine-readable.

(5) To the extent practicable, external websites shall be able to link to documents on the system.

(6) The system shall include digital audio and visual files of court recordings, when such files are available.

(7) The system shall provide search functions for public use.

(b) Minimizing the burden on pro se litigants.—In developing the system to comply with the requirements under subsection (a), the Director shall, to the extent practicable, not impose a disproportionate impact on pro se litigants.

(c) Use of technology.—In developing the system under subsection (a), the Director shall use modern technology in order—

(1) to improve security, data accessibility, affordability, and performance; and

(2) to minimize the burden on pro se litigants.

(d) Authority To exempt certain documents.—The Director may identify categories of documents which are not made publicly accessible under subsection (a)(1), and categories of court proceedings, the recordings of which are not made available under subsection (a)(6).

SEC. 4. Definition of machine-readable.

In this Act, the term “machine-readable” means a format in which information or data can be easily processed by a computer without human intervention while ensuring no semantic meaning is lost.